Learning Disability, School Achievement, and Grade Retention among Children with Cleft: A Two-Center Study

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary L. Broder ◽  
Lynn C. Richman ◽  
Pamela B. Matheson
1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary L. Broder ◽  
Lynn C. Richman ◽  
Pamela B. Matheson

Objective This study examined the prevalence of learning disability (LD), level of school achievement; and prevalence of grade retention by type of cleft and gender at two craniofacial centers. Setting The setting included two university-based craniofacial centers. Design/Patients Participants included 84 consecutively evaluated patients from one center who were matched by cleft type, age, and gender with 84 patients evaluated at the second center. Outcomes The outcomes included learning disability, school achievement, and grade retention. Results The results revealed that 46% of subjects with cleft had LD, 47% had deficient educational progress, and 27% had repeated a grade (excluding kindergarten) in school. Males with cleft palate only (CPO) had a significantly higher rate of LD than any other subject group. Males with CPO and females with cleft lip and palate (CLP) were more likely to repeat a grade in school than were females with CPO and males with CLP. Conclusions Children with cleft are at risk for learning disability, low school achievement, and grade retention.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Diris

This study analyzes the effect of age-based retention on school achievement at different stages of education. I estimate an instrumental variable model, using the predicted probability of retention given month of birth as an instrument, while simultaneously accounting for the effect of month of birth on maturity at the time of testing. The analysis further assesses heterogeneity in retention effects by achievement, by background characteristics, and by type of skill. Using international data from multiple waves of the PISA international assessment test, I find that grade retention in primary school harms student achievement across the distribution, while delayed school entry can produce positive results for those at the lower end. The identified local average treatment effect indicates that letting students retain in primary school because of a low relative age is harmful for their future school achievement.


1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Maughan ◽  
Stephan Collishaw ◽  
Andrew Pickles

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 549-549
Author(s):  
Hannes Steiner ◽  
Thomas Akkad ◽  
Christian Gozzi ◽  
Brigitte Springer-Stoehr ◽  
Georg Bartsch

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Gilling ◽  
Wilhelm A. Huebner ◽  
Flavio T. Rocha ◽  
Marcus V. Sadi ◽  
Oliver M. Schlarp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document